Rajeev Masand’s Review Of Dunkirk

Watching Christopher Nolan’s Dunkirk is an experience that I’d imagine feels a lot like watching a ticking bomb from close quarters. This is a suspenseful film about a chapter in World War II history whose outcome is no secret. Yet Nolan, aided by Hans Zimmer’s thunderous score, conjures a relentless sense of dread and jeopardy that creeps into your bones.

This is the story of the evacuation of Allied troops – more than 300,000 soldiers, mostly British – who were stranded on the beaches of Dunkirk in northern France, desperate to make it across the English Channel, while being bombarded by the Nazis.

It’s a story that unfolds on land, on the sea, and in the air, and Nolan, who wrote the script himself, weaves the three narrative threads together seamlessly. On the ground, amidst the falling bombs and chaos, we follow a young, scared British soldier named Tommy (newcomer Fionn Whitehead) as he struggles to stay alive until he can be rescued. Up above, a handful of Royal Air Force Spitfire pilots, including Farrier (Tom Hardy), engage in dogfights against German bomber and fighter planes to keep the men on the ground safe. There’s also the track involving a civilian English sailor, Dawson (Mark Rylance), and his teenage son who head out in his small leisure yacht across the Channel to bring home as many of the stranded soldiers as they can.

One of the film’s big, bold moves is Nolan’s decision to intercut between these three related but distinct narratives, each of which has its own timeline and duration. The evacuation on the beach lasted over a week, the air battle a little over an hour, while Dawson’s crossing of the Channel takes all of one day. Merging the three tracks to appear as if all the action is taking place simultaneously helps escalate the sense of immediacy and urgency that the film relies on.

Unlike Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan (widely considered the best war film in recent times) which traded in stomach-turning images of disembodied corpses to convey the horrors of war, there is virtually no sight of blood in Dunkirk. Instead, this is a film that throws you front and centre into the action to experience the terror first-hand. The aerial scenes are especially hair-raising, and add to the overall effect of a race against time. The terrific camerawork, sound design, and propulsive score work together to deliver an intense immersive experience that is best enjoyed on an IMAX screen. There was a pin-drop silence throughout the screening I attended; you couldn’t even hear the sound of popcorn being munched. Fitting, perhaps, for a film with barely any dialogue.

This is that rare war film without the rousing speeches. There is no big victory in the end; this is a film about a desperate struggle for survival. The cast of mostly unknown actors does a good job of portraying the terror of the situation, while familiar faces – like One Direction’s Harry Styles in the role of a soldier trying to make his way back home, Cillian Murphy as a shell-shocked soldier rescued from a sinking ship, and Kenneth Branagh as an honourable naval commander – lend heft to the proceedings.

Dunkirk is robust filmmaking, and sits nicely with Nolan’s impressive body of work. It’s a riveting, overwhelming piece of cinema, and another reminder of how skilfully he marries affecting character drama with sheer spectacle. I’m going with four-and-a-half out of five. It’s one of the year’s best films.

Rating: 4.5 / 5

Did you like this blog?*
How did you find this blog?*
What kind of articles would you like to read on the blog?*
Name:*
E-mail:*

2 Comments

  1. Mukesh

    July 23, 2017 at 2:41 pm

    I was waiting for your review on "Dunkirk".

     

    For almost every movie you give a review with a little high sort of English. The content you present is almost not understood by the comman folks. 

     

    I expected such high fundu English for this movie. The way you wrote felt like kid watching a great movie after a long time.

     

    It was not about Dawson and his teenage son who across the Channel to bring home as many of the stranded soldiers as they can. 

     

    Dawson a brave father of a great RAF's polit across the Channel in seach of his son.

     

    The story was a person who wanted to go home, the story was about a father's and son's love, 

     

    The story was about a great soul to defend his fellow lads on cost of his life,

     

    The story was about leadership who stood for the weak 

    (Remember the officer stood back for french), 

     

    The story was about hope 

    (civilians came to recuse the soldier when the officer only arranged few boat for the them) 

    The officer asks the one civilian were are you from.. listen to her which place she says.

     

    Christopher Nolan is not a person who needs action to show expression.

     

    I thought you understood the story.

    • ramesh

      July 28, 2017 at 3:00 pm

      How do I like your reply to this review?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


1 × two =

More in Rajeev Masand

All articles/blogs are intended to inform, entertain and amuse. We make no representations or guarantees about the truth, accuracy or quality of any content.

Copyright 2017 © Bigtree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Subscribe to our email newsletter today to receive updates on the latest news!
Thank You For Subscribing To Us!

Now get regular updates on the latest entertainment news and style trends.

Providing you with the best of Bollywood, Hollywood, style and more.
Get the best in entertainment, while keeping yourself entertained!
We respect your privacy. Your information is safe and will never be shared.
Don't miss out. Subscribe today.
×
×
WordPress Popup